With the advent of disc brakes on road bikes, which have some negatives along with quite a few positives, disc brakes may or may not be the next big thing in the pro peloton. I still think, at least as far as the aero bikes go, rim brakes will be around for a long time. I reserve the right to be wrong though. Rim brakes are an interesting topic for discussion when it comes to we avid enthusiasts as well.
My best cycling bud has a 2014 Madone 7 Series that has an integrated front brake that follows the contour of the fork, which I really like, and a rear brake that, instead of its normal place behind the seat tube, is hidden behind the bottom bracket in the chain stays…
BMC has followed suit:
At first blush, this seems really cool, at least it did to me. Having spent hundreds of miles on Mike’s wheel this summer, the lack of a brake between the seat stays just cleans up the whole back of the bike… Kinda cool if you ask me.
However, during those several hundred miles on Mike’s wheel, I noticed that when he was really putting the power down, his brakes would rub on the rim, side to side. Now, to clarify, he’s also got top of the line alloy wheels on his bike (Rolf Prima’s). In other words, it’s not just the wheels. What he ended up doing was opening the brakes a few more millimeters to give him enough clearance that the wheel no longer rubs under power. Now, he likes to run his brakes a lot closer than I do (I like a little give and modulation when I pull the lever), so this has been a bit of a struggle for him.
Additionally, and more importantly, that brake is directly in the line of fire in wet conditions from the spray off of the front wheel. If he rides even in a decent drizzle, his rear brake collects a massive amount of grit and gunk from the road. You think normal rim brake stopping sucks in the rain, you should hear him complain when we’re out and getting wet. This is a huge negative for the placement of the rear brake – enough that I’d never buy a bike with the rear brake at the bottom bracket.
Now, Trek has masterfully addressed this concern with the Madone 9 series:
They got around the rear brake cable issue by making their own proprietary brake that works just like the normal road bike rim brake but with the cable coming out of the seat tube, making it a center-pull brake. Quite ingenious actually. This works, of course, because of the seat mast rather than seat post… In any event, if I had to guess, there’s a reason they moved away from the cleaner look of the bottom bracket mounted brake: Because it’s actually a bad place to put a brake.
That said, there’s one more innovation I wanted to point out: Moving the front brake to the back of the fork:
This is also becoming rather popular (or hiding the brake in the fork for Time Trial bikes)… I have no opinion on this, other than to say it looks a little cleaner than the normal location. Whichever is the case, it seems to me, the fork would actually protect the brake from grime, behind the fork (though I do wonder how well the cable pull works in real-world conditions).
In any event, you might want to reconsider a bike with a bottom bracket location for the brake if you’re going to be riding in wet conditions a lot… On the other hand, if it’s going to be your sunshine only bike, just set the rear brake a little wider than normal and ride that ride with a smile… It’s all good.
My goodness, I almost forgot! The new Venge Vias (I’m obviously biased):
While I have my reservations about the looks of the stem/steering tube interface, the brake placements, both, are awesome and incredibly innovative and that got the rear brake up out of the muck… While I haven’t ridden a Vias, we should all know by now how I feel about my Venge… If I had an extra $12,000 to blow, that bike would be sitting in my bike room right now. Pure Awesome. Or would I get the Madone?
Maybe I should spend all winter in the office, make a ton of money and buy ’em both, yeah? Somehow I think Mrs. Bgddy would have a problem with that.